Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nauscopy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 22:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nauscopy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't see any indication that this company is even borderline notable. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 02:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. czar · · 03:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. czar · · 03:38, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Non-notable, none of those listed acts are even big names.--TelevisionMan13 (talk) 05:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This !vote has been struck as coming from a sockpuppet account. See this SPI. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 17:31, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Sun City Girls, for one, are a rather big name in underground rock. --Rabbitfighter (talk) 02:44, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I see no evidence that they are a "big name". The Wikipedia article on them, for example, contains only one independent source, and that one doesn't indicate that they are a "big name". In fact, that article if anything seems to suggest that they are not all that notable, including statements such as "They found little mainstream success". In any case, we need evidence that there is substantial coverage of Nauscopy, not just of someone that Nauscopy has connections to. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 07:46, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article does not cite any reliable independent sources, and I see no evidence of notability anywhere else, either. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.