Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nauman Sadiq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Islamabad cricket team. Sandstein 10:37, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nauman Sadiq[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricketer, nothing significant in searches, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 22:40, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:46, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:46, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:46, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Islamabad cricket team Has played 5 FC and 1 T20 match, but I couldn't find any significant coverage in a search. May have become a journalist since retirement but not 100% on that and doesn't make him notable either. Redirect is a suitable WP:ATD but would be nice for a list page to be set up at some point. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:48, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per RF22. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:45, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A total and complete failure of GNG. I do not trust the redirect votes. These people have fought against GNG so hard, they are probably trying to redirect to do a backhanded recreation of the article when no one is looking.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John, could you please show me some examples where this has happened with cricket articles recently? If this is the case I'll very happily revert them for you. Redirect is a perfectly acceptable WP:ATD (something that should be looked for before the AfD is even listed) and the common outcome if there isn't enough coverage for a full article is to be redirected to the list of their respective club. If you can't find any examples of a backhanded recreation of [a] article when nobody is looking then will you please remove that lie from your statement please. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:29, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Islamabad cricketers which would need to be created. JPL, I've looked at the most recent AfD's you've been involved with. Never once have you voted keep, or redirect, even where one or the other was the correct conclusion. StickyWicket (talk) 19:09, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.