Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nature's Housekeeper

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Sphilbrick per CSD U1. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nature's Housekeeper[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK. Has yet to be published. A search of its working title reveals no references on Google. Bgwhite (talk) 06:56, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This book has been issued an ISBN, thus it approved for publication by the Library of Congress.

Moreover, Why are ISBN-granted/LOC books not worthy of inclusion but "upcoming films" are?

Here are a list of all the "upcoming films" listed on wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=is+an+upcoming+film+by&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maldoror2 (talk • contribs) 07:29, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to author's page Not enough material to show notability at the moment. Suggest redirecting to author's page (it is covered on that page under Current Works) and recreating the article once notability is demonstrated through media interest/reviews/etc. Stephen! ^Coming... 09:34, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.