Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National recognition of Meitei culture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 23:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National recognition of Meitei culture[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is basically a synthesis created for purposes of WP:Peacock. PepperBeast (talk) 02:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: India and Manipur. PepperBeast (talk) 02:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and Politics. Skynxnex (talk) 04:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not really seeing why this page is needed or meets the notability criteria for inclusion. JMWt (talk) 09:05, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails wp:n. It is all puffery. RangersRus (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : The article is cited with numerous sources for each paragraph, supporting all the claims. None of them are fake claims. Anyone can scrutinise it. There's no question of WP:NOTABILITY in this case. If anyone believes that the article is suffering from WP:PEACOCK (or the so called WP:PUFFERY), then he/she can rewrite the article to correct the problem or, if unsure how best to make a correction, the article may be tagged with an appropriate template, such as {{Peacock term}}. Deletion isn't the solution in case of the rationale given for this AFD. --Haoreima (talk) 01:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Okoslavia (talk) 12:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.