Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Feminism Political Party of the United States of America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 11:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

National Feminism Political Party of the United States of America[edit]

Tagged for notability since June 27, 2006. Delete as non-notable. utcursch | talk 11:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article consists of a list of officers - all one of them. Party only two years old and barely registers on Dogpile, let alone Google. Virtually no media coverage. Last two lines are copyvio from their website. Strong delete. B.Wind 11:43, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, their website claims to have run four candidates in the recent midterms:

Veronica Hambacker: no mention of the NFPP on her website, appears to be a Democrat [1]
Carol Gay: another Democrat; no mention of the NFPP on her list of endorsements
Florice Hoffman: yet another Democrat [2]; doesn't mention any endorsement [3]
Dan Rodriguez Schlorff : Green Party [4]. (He does mention their endorsement though [5])

So it looks like these are not NFPP candidates, the NFPP just endorsed them (and the NFPP is not sufficiently notable for even these not-particularly high-profile candidates to mention the endorsement on their website). Delete as unverifiable and not notable. Demiurge 11:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable and no sources at all. Jayden54 14:32, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone above. Unverified and apparently highly non-notable. -- Kicking222 15:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As above. As a UK resident, I am happy to state that the claim in the article of representation here is nonsense. I would have said b*llsh*t, but that's probably non-wikipaedic.--Anthony.bradbury 18:25, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete article is not verified with independent and reliable sources.-- danntm ^T _C 21:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nope. Get rid of it. Yankee Rajput 03:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This party is not listed as a political party at Politics1.com, which lists some pretty obscure parties. Furthermore, not only does the NFPP not have almost a million registered voters, I don't even believe that they claim to have almost a million registered voters, since that could easily be proven false. As Ballot Access News indicates, there is no party other than the Democrats and Republicans with even half a million registered voters in the USA, and the NFPP doesn't even show up among the significant minor parties. --Metropolitan90 03:45, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn notable, unverified.--Dakota 06:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.