Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Council for Geocosmic Research
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. I think we can close debate on this one, this doesn't have a snowball's chance of closing any other way. Also recommend MakeSense64 be barred from creating new AfD requests due to his COI vendetta for off-wiki banishment from a web site. This is just another pointy nomination. CycloneGU (talk) 14:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
National Council for Geocosmic Research[edit]
- National Council for Geocosmic Research (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. An editor added two references, but this seem to be trivial mentions in "astrology from a-z" type directory books. Notability is too poor. MakeSense64 (talk) 07:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep While I agree that this article needs more references, the subject is notable as it says in the article it 'has a membership of over 3000 and has established 40 Chapters worldwide in 26 countries' and ' National Council for Geocosmic Research' has about 30000 Google hits.Miguel AG (talk) 12:12, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I added several sources, seems to clearly meet the general notability guidelines.--Pontificalibus (talk) 14:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.