Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Cannabis Industry Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Note: AfDs should not be relisted more than twice per WP:RELIST unless absolutely necessary. Kurykh (talk) 01:26, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

National Cannabis Industry Association[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

i believe the National Cannabis Industry Association is not notable while many companies in the cannabis industry are well known the National Cannabis Industry Association is not relevant to research on cannabis and this article seems to be one of advocacy of point of view of the organization in the work section also having an article National Cannabis Industry Association violates WP:CORP Jonnymoon96 (talk) 01:33, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:12, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not a company but a trade group/lobbying organization that seems to be controversial in the American legalization debate, to say the least, so WP:CORP isn't met and this nom is null and void; lobbying organizations in and of themselves usually advocate for their cause so the con side is naturally with somebody else (you're not seeing the National Rifle Association advocating against their own policies, for instance). Nate • (chatter) 21:25, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:27, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - readers should be able to read up on organizations they read about in the news.--Moxy (talk) 02:18, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jonnymoon96 (talk) 19:02, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.