Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Art Honor Society

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. It appears the content has been copied from Wikipedia. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:28, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National Art Honor Society[edit]

National Art Honor Society (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Directly copies content from https://www.lths.org/domain/124 Chase tanner00 (talk) 15:00, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Tagged as G11 and G12. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 15:17, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I have just encounted this on today's AfD so did a quick check on the copyvio claim. The article dates back to 2006 and much of the core prose is largely unchanged in that time. Looking on waybackmachine for the supposed copied site here, it only has records from 2014 onwards, with the first versions of the page being nothing like the article. Only in latter versions from 2016 onwards does the correlation between the two become apparent, and thus it's reasonable to assume based on this that it may be been copied from wikipedia, as opposed to wikipedia. A site that matches a suspected copyvio can't and should not always been assumed to be one way. If the AfD is weighted in this argument alone, it may be void unless further evidence to the contrary can be found. It can't be ruled out that it may have been copied from elsewhere at some point in time, but there is nothing to suggest that has been the case either. Bungle (talkcontribs) 15:32, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep After Bungle's edit, I see that I may have been incorrect. I was under the assumption that it was copied because a page of my own was going to be speedily deleted for copying from that website, even though I was just using and attributing some content from National Art Honor Society. I believe this AfD is now void. Chase tanner00 (talk) 18:22, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 16:55, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 16:55, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 16:55, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.