Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathawat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). NorthAmerica1000 13:50, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nathawat[edit]

Nathawat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been unreferenced for nearly 10 years. While this seems to be a popular Indian surname, there is no evidence of notability beyond that and no evidence that any of the information presented in the article is true. At this point, it may well be a hoax. Mark Marathon (talk) 08:37, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 04:06, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:43, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. It isn't a hoax. See for example this. It's one of 71 sub-clans of Kachwaha - as such I admit to having no idea whether that makes it notable - probably not I would say unless significant coverage is found stating why it's notable. A redirect to the parent clan may be worth considering. --Michig (talk) 13:30, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.