Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Bottman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nathaniel Bottman[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined the PROD because there are two sources that might plausibly meet WP:GNG (see stories in the Seattle Times and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer). I do agree with the statements in support of deletion, that it is WP:TOOSOON for academic notability, thus failing WP:SCHOLAR and was unable to find any other independent sources about the subject. Enos733 (talk) 22:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Mathematics, and Washington. Enos733 (talk) 22:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While the citation record is strong for a 2015 PhD, it is light for Wikipedia WP:NPROF notability even in a low citation field like mathematics. No other sign of notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 11:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as TOOSOON at this point in time. In his current trajectory he'd be notable in a decade, but it's crystal ball for that. --Mvqr (talk) 15:33, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WesSirius (talk) 00:18, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not yet pass WP:PROF, and the child-prodigy newspaper coverage fails WP:BIO1E. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not pass WP:SCHOLAR, I agree it is WP:TOOSOON for this. NMasiha (talk) 18:12, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:PROF a case of WP:TOOSOON.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:25, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.