Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathanael Greene Historical Foundation (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Greensboro, Pennsylvania. And mention there at editors' discretion. Sandstein 16:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nathanael Greene Historical Foundation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a local non-profit without any national media coverage. Fails WP:NONPROFIT Rogermx (talk) 14:34, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:01, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:01, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep seems to have sufficient sources In ictu oculi (talk) 18:55, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Greensboro, Pennsylvania. As far as I can make out, reading between the lines of this advert. This is a community organisation in a village of 300 people to promote its conservation, which it does by holding an arts festival. As such it is not independently notable. Sourcing is not everything. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:16, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:42, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per the nomination. Promotional article for a local non-profit foundation. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 05:00, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support for Redirect to a very brief (single sentence) mention at Greensboro, Pennsylvania, perhaps under subhead Greensboro, Pennsylvania#The industrial era and today, basing redirect on a handful of mentions in regional dailies dating to 2007-9, about a dispute over custody of some historic artifacts, a fundraiser... small potatoes stuff but plausibly enough for a redirect. However, the article as it stands is mere puffery for a small (very small) town charity.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- notability not established and largely unsourced WP:ADVOCACY. This content belongs on the org's web site, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.