Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Kelly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seems to be WP:TOOSOON Bishonen | talk 01:17, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan Kelly[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposing deletion for a promotional page. Searches for 'Nathan Kelly composer' online yield little, let alone good evidence of notability. The sources given on the page are lacking. Most are to the Kelly's own personal website or to dead links. One source is to a 'DuckDuckGo' internet search for Kelly, which, funnily, does not give much more than this Wikipedia page. His IMDb page has, similarly, been used for promotional purposes. The linked IBDB page describes two positions: a 'special keyboard arrangement' and a 'music department assistant'. Unsourced references/advertisements to Kelly have also been included in other articles here. Some had already been removed and I have sorted the rest. 87.210.99.206 (talk) 21:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominator. 87.210.99.206 (talk) 22:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Completing nomination on behalf of above IP editor--above text is copied from article talk page. I have no opinion of my own on the nomination at this time. --Finngall ^talk 21:20, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am copying this from another user's (perhaps the subject's?) talk page (87.210.99.206 (talk) 22:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)):[reply]

I'm not sure how to exactly edit on Wikipedia but please do not delete this page. Though some of the sources could be cleaned up, if you like, the content is true and verifible, albeit difficult to do as Nathan Kelly is young musician but the projects and dates and facts are true indeed. Any help is appreciated but please do not delete the page, please, please. 2620:CC:8000:886:A9FE:A584:A663:536F 22:19, 24 March 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I was able to find this NY Times review of June in Buffalo at the University at Buffalo which talks a bit about one of Kelly's compositions. However, that is the best coverage I was able to find. The sourcing in the article consists of a mix of primary sources and unreliable sources. It seems this individual is still very early in his music career. No prejudicial to recreation in the future if he garners coverage in reliable sources as his career progresses. --- Whpq (talk) 02:35, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.