Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Coulter-Nile
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WjBscribe 03:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nathan Coulter-Nile[edit]
- Nathan Coulter-Nile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable rookie for non-professional team - article unlikely to be developable from reliable sources beyond its current content Orderinchaos 04:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Orderinchaos 04:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The WP:CRICKET notability guideline is generally one match at first-class or List A level. If he is any good he will get there eventually. The article as it stands should not be difficult to re-establish if this occurs. -- Mattinbgn/ talk 06:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If this page is deleted, then we would also need to have a look at Clint Heron, Arron Crawford, Liam Davis, Theo Doropoulos and Craig King. To check whether they have played any first class or A list matches, plug their names into the cricinfo database. Recurring dreams 07:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Rookie listed Western Australian cricketer, this bloke is clearly going to make it to the Western Warriors - it is worth keeping. Twenty Years 08:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nothing to keep and fails WP:CRIC notability criteria. —Moondyne 10:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - here he played for WA U/19's. Also here he played for Australia u/19's Twenty Years 12:08, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom and Mattinbgn, does not meet notablity requirment for cricket players Thewinchester (talk) 12:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. Eusebeus 23:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Does his Australia Cup appearance not qualify as a List A game? Duke of Whitstable 00:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It depends who you're talking to I suspect. The Cricket Australia Cup is played by the second XI state teams. Would the state schoolboys' comp. be List A? IMO the answer to your question is no, but others may disagree. —Moondyne 00:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom unless it can be sourced. John Vandenberg 08:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.