Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Howard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Delete. per WP:G4 as similar to article previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Howard (nomination) (non-admin closure) -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 19:09, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nate Howard[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A self-written vanity page, but some claim of notability, so can't speedy. I don't think he meets the notability criteria on the strength of one mention in a local paper. I fixed the refs Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:54, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Amazing what you find when you label something a stub and then google something. Jimnsaw one newspaper reference already listed but a google search has found plenty of references from major media sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Postcard Cathy (talk • contribs)
Comment: Note that this was deleted after an AfD in 2016. --Randykitty (talk) 12:38, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.