Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Fish (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Seeing as the claim of GNG being met has gone uncontested. Will tag as cleanup needed though as the need for cleanup has been stated and not contested either. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:58, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nate Fish[edit]

Nate Fish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Still no difference than 6 no the ago, absolutely nothing for actual notability at all. SwisterTwister talk 20:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - does not meet criterial for notability. Seems promotional or self-promotional. Netherzone (talk) 20:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:54, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per the result of the last AfD. Lepricavark (talk) 15:44, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per last AfD. Nothing has changed about the notability of Fish since June. Penale52 (talk) 16:00, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Per GNG. I found a number of articles specifically about him, [1] [2] [3] [4] plus more secondary coverage. Which should be enough to meet GNG, and that is just in English, not counting the likelihood of Hebrew coverage. Rlendog (talk) 16:51, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - The article needs a lot of work, however he clearly meets WP:NBASE. It states Have appeared in at least one game in any one of the following active major leagues: Major League Baseball, Nippon Professional Baseball, KBO League, or have participated in a major international competition (such as the World Baseball Classic, Baseball World Cup or Olympics) as a member of a national team. Being as he has participated in the tournament as a player and coach, this shouldn't even be a question. - GalatzTalk 12:23, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Essentially the same as the version deleted in the last AFD. Contrary to the previous poster he has not played in the WBC... the qualifying tournaments are not usually accepted as sufficient for meeting that requirement. The article also contains many unsourced statements and reads like a resume or promotional blog rather than an encyclopedia article. Spanneraol (talk) 17:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Near as I can tell, he calls himself that on his blog. Spanneraol (talk) 06:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like your reason to delete is the article needs to be cleaned up. Perhaps instead WP:SOFIXIT would be more appropriate than deleting the page. - GalatzTalk 20:08, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.