Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nate Bender

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:12, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nate Bender[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This aquanaut and habitat technician doesn't satisfy WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:57, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Cool job, but coverage is in passign at best. Not notable per nom. --Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 05:37, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete primary sources, works as a technician, no claim to notability at all.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:37, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:35, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:27, 7 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.