Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Pradhan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (X! · talk) · @192 · 03:37, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Natasha Pradhan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Restored after proposed deletion. Original nomination was: "Non notable, fails WP:BIO. One newspaper article when she was fourteen, nothing since (some press releases, but those don't count). Article seems to be correct but is not sufficient." That seems to sum it up. Tikiwont (talk) 09:18, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as original prod nominator. She may become notable, just like many other 20 year olds, but she isn't there yet. Fram (talk) 09:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't meet the entertainer criteria or WP:N really. I did manage to find one source which I've added to the article but I can't find anything else. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 18:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She is not notable. No significant coverage of her. --Bejnar (talk) 02:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.