Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalya Rudakova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Gwen Gale (talk) 11:06, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Natalya Rudakova[edit]

According to the history presented in the article, this actress has had no career what-so-ever apart from this new, about-to-be-released movie. I'm not so sure that that's an assertion of notability, can you all please weigh in here? — Dæ dαlus^Contribs /_Improve 12:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

* Delete As it stands, all the article states is she's been cast / filmed a not yet released film, moved to the US and a producer seems to have a freckle fetish. I'd say, unless anything else can be provided - and imdb lists this film only - it's non-notable. Delete and re-create a better article once the film in released when she gains notability. Minkythecat (talk) 12:28, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Struck above comments to reflect films release, in which case notability is a definite based upon billing. Minkythecat (talk) 09:47, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Evidently notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 19:25, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The movie she is in (Transporter 3) went into wide release in the United States yesterday (November 26), and according to the Internet Movie Database, she has second billing in it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:09, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Although the notability guidelines at WP:ENTERTAINER require multiple feature films, an exception should be made here because of the wide media coverage, as demonstrated by Colonel Warden. If after the movie hype is over, she again falls into obscurity the article can be renominated at that time as a WP:BLP1E. BradV 20:56, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She played lead in a major hollywood production. Freckles or no freckles, IMHO, that makes her notable. Anonymi (talk) 09:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Looking at the edit histories, it appears the creator of the article and the editor who nominated for deletion were in some kind of editing war, antagonizing each other. Per discussion above, actress appears quite notable. Chicken Wing (talk) 10:56, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.