Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Gal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nobody seems to be interested in the newly offered sources. Sandstein 19:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Gal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Currently sourced by dubious sources such as IMDB and primary sources. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:02, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Top news hit is the WP:BLPSOURCES-violating Daily Star and it just goes downhill from there. Unsalvageable. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:18, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing close to the reliable source coverage we require to create articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not going to vote (at least not now), but I found some sources that are not routine coverage of America’s Next Top Model (Natasha Galkina is her real name): [1][2][3][4][5]. Not sure if they secure WP:GNG or not, but may help give us more basis for voting one way or another. Linguist^un Eins ^uno 08:16, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting per sources presented later in the discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.