Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Cohen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Cohen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not really my field, so I may be judging wrong, but she seems to have had minor roles only, and the references are not substantial 3rd party reliable published sources, but press releases or blogs or mere notices DGG ( talk ) 19:47, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because the sources are not reliable. Whether she is notable for an article based on roles is a different story. Trillfendi (talk) 17:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All of the credits attributed here are true and correct. I can personally attest to the relationship status and all credits listed on IMDb. That these credits are unsupported is spurious. It is a curious request, as there is no embellishment to what are legitimate proven facts, therefore indisputable and verifiable by simply checking IMDb- a universally recognized authoritative database regarding film and television production and performance. It is my hope that this petition is initiated by one unfamiliar with the industry and not someone possessing a personal bias. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fordtrent (talk • contribs) 06:44, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sources do not establish GNG and the subject's acting credits appear to be minor roles. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.