Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Caro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:51, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Natalie Caro[edit]

Natalie Caro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CREATIVE, WP:ACADEMIC and WP:GNG notability guidelines. My WP:BEFORE was unsuccessful in turning up appropriate references. As an aside, the lack of references and the familiar tone cause me to be suspicious of WP:COI editing (though I fully admit that this could be remedied if the decision is made to keep this article). Overall, I think it is WP:TOOSOON for an article about this subject. Jmertel23 (talk) 18:34, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Jmertel23 (talk) 18:34, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Jmertel23 (talk) 18:34, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:19, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:19, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.