Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalia Rak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 10:00, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Natalia Rak[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procedural (my !vote is to keep). This was prodded and deleted last year - as I discovered while trying to link to the article. I feel that it may be borderline, but if this artist has had murals in places as far afield as Poland, New York, and New Zealand, she may well be notable enough for an article. A google news search also turns up quite a secondary references. Grutness...wha? 10:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Commissions of public murals in multiple countries, and sufficient coverage exists, e.g. [1], [2], [3], with further sources such as [4], [5]. --Michig (talk) 11:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Street art and coverage in multiple countries, meets WP:BASIC at least. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:04, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Decent coverage is available. Meets GNG.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:31, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.