Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalia LaMonica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g3, vandalism, clear hoax, part of pattern of hoax articles. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Natalia LaMonica[edit]

Article appears to be a hoax (no sources provided) by user who has only contributed this single article. Lady Lynx website has no indication that such a person exists, and no google hits except the wikipedia page. Jogurney (talk) 14:00, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Jogurney (talk) 14:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete I can't find anyevidence of her existence Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Apparent hoax. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 14:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete smells like hoax - the subject's name sound more like belonging to an Italian-American than a subject from a former Spanish colony of Africa. --Angelo (talk) 14:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and recreate later when sources are found. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 15:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete along with Carolina Galati‎, Katarina DaCosta‎, Caroline Frolic‎, Sandra Sardinia‎, Zrinka Naglic‎, Carmen Dominica‎ and Dena Lansdowne‎ which User:Whu2000 has also created today. They all appear to be hoaxes. --Jimbo^[online] 18:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If it were true she'd be rocking the notability. However, it's not. Delete per WP:HOAX Vickser (talk) 04:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - this is beyond the AFD process. This user, and IP's 74.12.20.137, 74.12.32.174 , and 74.12.31.182 have added many Lady Lynx players, and edited national pages to support there existance. 05:36, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Speedy delete as G3. Complete and utter bullshit. I've speedied the rest, reverted the vandalism, and placed notes and warning on the relevent user pages. Nfitz (talk) 06:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.