Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nat Young (artist) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nat Young (artist)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a non-notable artist. No independent secondary sources analyze the subject. Previous AfD was never completed. Abductive (reasoning) 02:28, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable and reads like an advert. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable and does not meet required BLP criteria for sources.--Kudpung (talk) 03:39, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this is an obvious personal advertisement. The muramasa (talk) 08:10, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable person with an article that's written like an advertisement. I can't see any way of saving this. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 21:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.