Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasir Mahmood Khosa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Seraphim System ^(talk) 14:48, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nasir Mahmood Khosa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

other than being a former secretary and a grade 22 officer, nothing significant about the person Jibran1998 (talk) 18:19, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - firstly, the top tier of civil servants (e.g. permanent undersecretaries in the UK) are usually notable. With Nasir there is a massive amount of coverage on when he was nominated as caretaker chief minister, the objections to him and his recusal. E.g. Source 1 Source 2 Source 3 Source 4 Nosebagbear (talk)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, KCVelaga (talk • mail) 00:36, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Regards, KCVelaga (talk • mail) 00:36, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 03:20, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep pass basic GNG. Profile on Geo News. --Saqib (talk) 06:55, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Saqib and Nosebagbear. Both of them already have shown and mentioned enough news coverage about his notability. I am sure even more news coverage can be found, if one looks for it. Ngrewal1 (talk) 14:16, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - top tier officer. Easily passes basic WP:GNG test. Störm (talk) 15:54, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ample coverage available. Clearly passes WP:GNG. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 07:40, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW query? - 5 straight keeps is usually the point where SNOW would seem a possibility, if some uninvolved figures might consider it Nosebagbear (talk) 09:55, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes basic WP:GNG and can move further Snowycats (talk) 16:25, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:39, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.