Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nasibi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Shia–Sunni relations. Tone 19:56, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nasibi[edit]

Nasibi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG, WP:NOTDICTIONARY AtlasDuane (talk) 20:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AtlasDuane (talk) 20:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. AtlasDuane (talk) 20:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. AtlasDuane (talk) 20:00, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:07, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can this be merged somewhere? We have plenty of articles on terminology of specific ideologies. BD2412 T 03:28, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Shia–Sunni relations. The entire content consists of a WP:DICDEF with no context and which doesn't even fully define the term. The remainder is a pair of hadiths that are completely lacking in explanation or secondary sources. It is impossible to tell from this what the term actually means or how it is used, save that one group uses it to refer to another within Islam. There is no content worth preserving through a merge and no indication that the term itself is notable. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:31, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.