Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naruto geography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mailer Diablo 10:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naruto geography[edit]

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information; listcruft and unencyclopedic. hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 07:57, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unencyclopedic and indeed fairly OR-ish. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- TheFarix (Talk) 11:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the list meets WP:FICTION's criteria for notablity with listing notable and non-notable places. --TheFarix (Talk) 11:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep I say weak since I'm not familiar with Naruto, but articles about settings in fictional works are not uncommon. There may be some non-notable locations that are listed, but it would appear there are notable ones, which would warrant an article cleanup, not a deletion. -- Ned Scott 12:40, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets WP:FICTION. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 13:53, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I agree with TheFarix. – Pedantic79^(talk) 19:14, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per TheFarix MarineCorps 20:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. While my first impression is fancruft, it does seem to meet WP:FICT, and also seems relatively well sourced. --Wine Guy Talk 00:24, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep simply because this information is actually helpful, though somewhat excessive for a single article I will admit. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 07:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ned Scott -ScotchMB 20:19, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep please meets fiction guideline Yuckfoo 06:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets guidelines, is informative, and is verifiable to source materials. Is also referenced by other Naruto articles.Rayfire 05:01, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.