Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narroways Hill Junction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Narroways Hill Junction[edit]

Narroways Hill Junction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Railway junctions generally do not warrant their own articles. Ref's are generally from rail-related sources, suggesting it fails WP:GNG. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:37, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and England. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:37, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The best I can find is [1], which has some brief mentions, but not enough to demonstrate significant coverage. It's just a couple of switches - nothing notable about it. I would not oppose a redirect to a suitable target, but I didn't find any obvious ones. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:17, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.