Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narn Bat Squad (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Speedy deleted by administrator Jeffrey O. Gustafson. Non-admin closure. I (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Narn Bat Squad[edit]

A minor, long-forgotten usenet neologism/in-joke coined by Babylon 5 fans, based on a post made by J. Michael Straczynski one day. Impossible to verify except by sifting the posts themselves. Fails almost every guideline you could care to mention. Nydas^(Talk) 22:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The subject isn't notable, it's also unverified. So I suggest deletion. I (talk) 01:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete rabidly. Simply unnotable in-jokery. --Dhartung | Talk 03:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Vorlons have a question. The Shadows have a question. Lorien has several questions. I have a question, too: "Who documented this in depth outside of Wikipedia and where was it documented?". The answer appears to be, from my research: "1 person, ever, by the name of Steven Orso, on a short WWW page.". Reliability of web pages as sources aside, this isn't enough sourcing to support a whole article. (Indeed, the article is longer than that 1 source itself is, with much of the article being original research, that isn't supported at all by any sources anywhere.) There's no evidence that anyone other than that 1 person has ever documented this, thus demonstrating that it is both notable and an idea that has actually escaped its creators and been acknowledged by the rest of the world; and there are no supporting sources for ensuring that an article on this subject is neutral and accurate. 1 short source is not enough. The PNC is not satisfied. Delete. Uncle G (talk) 13:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.