Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naoman Alam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite 01:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naoman Alam[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has already been multiply created and deleted at Noman Alam. Now that page has been protected, it is popping up at this alternative spelling. All sources are primary, and there is no indication of notability. See google results for this alternative spelling: [1]. Combining the presumed primary with the spelling of a book doesn't help: [2]. I believe this may be a vanity piece, as the two individuals creating it (see User talk:Umanskaya and User talk:Alam82) are almost certainly the same person, given edit histories. An AfD gives the contributor the opportunity to verify notability. If WP:BIO cannot be verified by reliable sources, I think this should be deleted and salted as well. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Can't find authoritative third party notability sources. Concur with salting as well if, indeed, this is a repeat attempt to include this biography. --Quartermaster (talk) 18:17, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no indication of notability. Salt if necessary to prevent re-creation. JohnCD (talk) 14:28, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.