Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanotron Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 08:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Nanotron Technologies

Nanotron Technologies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Article does not assert notability as per WP:CORP Article sounds like autobiography of the company, the company does not meet notability criteria. No sources cited, and all sources that can be found on the web are copies of press releases or company profiles on directories. dockingman^talk 15:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

• This is AFD, not speedy deletion. We don't go on whether articles "assert notability" here. We go by whether the subjects actually do or do not satisfy the relevant criteria, which are WP:CORP in this case. That requires everyone, you included, to do the research. You've given no indication in your rationale that you looked to see whether there were any published works about this company. Please do the research, and give a good rationale. Uncle G 20:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I updated the nomination description. -- dockingman^talk 20:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Thank you. That's a much better rationale. We need more rationales like that. Uncle G 09:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 02:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Doesn't seem to be a case of corporate vanity, though. MER-C 03:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I don't see anything online about them except press releases.--Brianyoumans 03:57, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete article appears unable to meet WP:CORP Bec-Thorn-Berry 04:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.