Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nandapal Mahathera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nandapal Mahathera[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Religious leader whose notability is not established by article or references. This article is obviously incomplete, with empty sections. It was also evidently written to praise its subject rather than describe him neutrally. Moving the incomplete article into draft space would be appropriate, except that the originator has also created a draft, either out of impatience, or in order to game the system.

This article was tagged for deletion as an unsourced BLP once, and sources were added, but do not make the article ready for mainspace.

The draft is a copy of the third reference, and has been tagged for deletion as copyvio.

A very brief check of the references shows that they do not provide independent significant coverage.

Reference	Comments	Independent	Significant
1	In Bengali. Machine translation says that subject preached.	?	No. Passing mention.
2	Appears to be local newspaper.	No. Editoral reportage praising the subject at length.
3	Own web site. Copied by draft.	No
4	Appears to be local newspaper.	Yes?	No. Could not find mention of subject.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:09, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. There is nothing asserted to be special about this figure as compared to the field of religious figures. BD2412 T 03:37, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not sign of Notability Dam222 🌋 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.