Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanae Katō

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There seems to be no obvious consensus coming from this discussion, even after being relisted twice. Closing as no consensus with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nanae Kato[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With only Ahiru as Nanae Kato's main role, and little to no news coverage and strong references, the subject in question is clearly not notable enough to warrant her own independent article. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 04:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:05, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete She plays title characters in Croket!, Princess Tutu, and the not-so-notable Noramimi. Not sure if that's good enough to keep around or write any sort of article. Croket!'s had 78 episodes in Japan. She plays some supporting/recurring characters in Inazuma Eleven and Inazuma Eleven Go. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:27, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It looks like one of her CDs was covered by news media, this combined with her main character role. [1], [2]. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's essentially a press release/promotional piece for a generic seiyuu band with six other members. It's hard to see how it could be evidence of notability. That they only lasted a few months before splitting the first time says a lot.SephyTheThird (talk) 18:47, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:32, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - her voicing some title characters, some more supporting characters, plus her CDs receiving RS coverage allows her to just scrape past WP:NACTOR I guess. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 08:00, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"I guess"? Does this mean that you're not entirely sure whether or not the subject should have her own independent article? Also, please read Sephy's post. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 08:28, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, it means I'm more or less on the fence and thus am defaulting towards keep, hence the "weak" part of my !vote. Satellizer el Bridget ^(Talk) 11:17, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SST flyer 12:33, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.