Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nana Kwame Bediako

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JGHowes ^talk 02:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nana Kwame Bediako[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PUFF. No effective coverage. Fail WP:BIO, WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 22:14, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:22, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:22, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The Forbes article looks good. Seems like it originated from the editorial team and not a 'contributer' article. And maybe a couple of other sources are good, although I'm not sure if they're RS. Hmanburg (talk) 07:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's the lady: Peace Hyde. scope_creep^Talk 09:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia article states that she's a correspondent for Forbes, if I'm not mistaken then I guess that's from the editorial team right? Hmanburg (talk) 17:37, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 23:52, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep made a copyedit. I agree that the Forbes article shows notability. Balle010 (talk) 04:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The Forbes article does not show notability . It's an interview where the subject is permitted to say whatever he pleases about his own company. That 's PR, and it remains PR no matter where the press agent gets it published. Itn terms of the GNG, it is not actually independent. DGG ( talk ) 06:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more round for the sake of generating further community input. Thanks everyone for assuming good faith and for your contributions to Wikipedia!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 22:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Was conferred with a lifetime achievement award but the source provided is an article written by a contributor. Lacks indepth coverage.Ruqayya ansari (talk) 12:07, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, DGG, and lack of WP:RS. Bearian (talk) 21:13, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.