Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naking
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:20, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Naking[edit]
- Naking (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Badly written about ephemeral trend. Geschichte (talk) 19:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There are not enough sources to establish that this is a trend worth having an article on.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I initially PRODded this as a neologism, but the author cleared the prod after it expired but before anyone got rid of the article. Still stands to be deleted for the same reason and for the reasons above. Deadbeef 20:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Article does not establish notability, and my own searches turn up nothing useful. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Hard to judge if this will be short-lived, as if you search for this hashtag on photo sharing sites you'll finds hoards of recent photos. Nonetheless outside of a few tumblr blogs there's not much to support this as "notable" trend. — MusikAnimal talk 21:32, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of notability. --Dmol (talk) 21:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The topic appears to not meet WP:N; it exists, but not finding wp:sigcov in reliable sources at this time. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:47, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.