Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Najma Zala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Najma Zala[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. The handful of sources I find are affiliated, social media, and/or material where she's been quoted about the topic of the material. Largoplazo (talk) 12:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 15:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 15:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:09, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is currently a list of fifteen references in the article which all appear to be articles written by the subject between November 2015 and August 2016. I note that while these are published on the BBC website, none of these appear inline and they don't appear to actually verify any of the various claims made in the article aside from having had a role as a journalist, nor could this source be considered independent of the subject. Around 2014 a women’s rights activist in Kabul of the same name was quoted in a few sources, including the Wall Street Journal [1]. Otherwise I didn't find any sources worth mentioning. Notability has not been established when judged against WP:BASIC or WP:GNG. Drchriswilliams (talk) 18:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.