Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nairba Sirrah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per G7. Skier Dude (talk) 03:29, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nairba Sirrah[edit]

A lot of MySpace and a few parts in unknown films. I don't think this meets WP:N. ~~SIS~~ 00:06, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Doesn't show notability per WP:BIO. Schuym1 (talk) 00:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: At resent, the article does not present any national or international notability as required by an encyclopaedia. Also there is a total lack of references. In time the individual may achieve a better listing of credits and references. At such time the individual may require another evaluation. At present, I suggest that the article be deleted. Royalhistorian (talk) 01:06, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nairba Sirrah is a brand new page being acurately edited. please Do not delete. Nairba Sirrah has an ImDB page at http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2736568/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nairba (talk • contribs) 00:19, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't show notability per WP:BIO. You have the remainder of this AFD to improve the article (5 days). Schuym1 (talk) 00:21, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of notability--and in the meantime, this editor will attempt to make the article more encyclopedic by axing exerpts from subject's interview with himself. Drmies (talk) 03:39, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The author has blanked the page and the only other non-trivial contributor has voted to delete. G7 speedy? • Gene93k (talk) 05:56, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable, no reliable sources, spam, vanity article

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.