Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naila Nayem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nakon 02:26, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Naila Nayem[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No Significant works.Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 18:47, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Week delete - Although few in number, news coverage included in the article seems reliable and significant. I will change to keep if anyone can provide some more reliable sources. - Rahat (Talk * Contributions) 07:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, Rahat bro, She may be in some news article, but has not done anything notable (in modeling or TVC or films), she has got some publicity in media due to her body exposure only. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 08:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:57, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 05:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I can see at least three reliable sources with indepth coverage in the article, enough to pass WP:GNG. --Zayeem ^(talk) 10:26, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I was going to evaluate but she engaged in a CoI with me :(. – nafSadh did say 06:26, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.