Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naijatastic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 06:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Naijatastic[edit]

Naijatastic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created since 2021, the sources available are paid for (Partner at TechCabal is a tag for paid sources) and it is laced with a lot of unreliable sources. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 06:05, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Reading Beans and his/her source evaluation. Given our discussions elsewhere about the difficulties evaluating Nigerian sources, I trust his/her judgement. This is tricky for oyiboes like me. --A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 06:13, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:25, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Sources are Paid/PR sources as mentioned by ReadingBeans. Jamiebuba (talk) 14:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I agree that all current sources are only promotional and I tried to find some other sources. I could find anything but promo and presentation-like articles, such as in Tribune Online Nigeria, This Day Live, or Sun News. There is no external coverage in these sources as well, apart from the typical advertisement presentation. Chiserc (talk) 08:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.