Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagchoudary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to Delete the article. =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:43, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nagchoudary[edit]

Non-notable [1]. Delete. utcursch | talk 04:29, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

weak Delete NN professor. although sounds like a nice guy. If the article is kept, at least move it to Dipankar Nagchoudary (see DA-IICT). jnothman ^talk 04:38, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. Also envy his students. I wish I had a, "spiritual guide" in school. Ifnord 05:23, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. *drew 07:06, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but move to his real name, Dipankar Nagchoudhuri (I'll do this now). His employer describes him as a man who has earned the honour of being styled "Dr", has been a professor for decades, and has written three books. I have a hunch that mistakes like this wouldn't be made if we'd all put a little more effort into our nominations, rather than just saying "non-notable" and optionally providing a link to a half-arsed Google search. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 07:24, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my vote to a weak delete; only his "Microelectronic Devices" seems to be mentioned by anyone but himself[2]. The books he has written are all textbooks, which doesn't make for notability in my mind: I don't think we have articles on other authors of textbooks; their distribution would usually be under 5000, I'd think. jnothman ^talk 07:42, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this and Dipankar Nagchoudhuri. Unnotable, below threshhold. Dottore So 10:29, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this and Dipankar Nagchoudhari, per above Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 14:20, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- I do not think he has become so notable right now to find a place here. Nothing specific is there to differentiate him from 1000s and 1000s of others in the world like him. --Bhadani 14:25, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.