Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nafeh (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus due to low participation and a lack of a conclusive outcome. Not willing to soft-delete due to generic nomination statement. Per L, no prejudice against imminent renomination if desired. Daniel (talk) 23:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nafeh[edit]

Nafeh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia:Notability (media). IamMM (talk) 16:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:05, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:32, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This strikes me as exactly the sort of subject for which sources probably WP:NEXIST, but locating them poses more of a research challenge. Twenty-three years is a solid length of time for a literary magazine to survive, and suggests a likelihood of historic significance. The linked "Mehr News Agency" source really makes me feel like there is more here-- per google translate, it is a 2007 article discussing the budget and distribution history of the magazine in depth. Searching "مجله نافه", the name of the magazine in Farsi, I get a lot of hits which might be good sources. I don't see proof yet that the magazine is notable, but I am hesitant to write it off. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 10:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:40, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.