Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naeem Taj

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Naeem Taj[edit]

Naeem Taj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unprodded without rationale dealing with the reason for the prod. 2 more cites were added however, which actually dealt with the single issue this doctor is known for, which reinforces the rationale for deletion, which is as per WP:BIO1E. Other than removing the one large organ, no in-depth coverage of this individual. Onel5969 TT me 02:05, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Reads like 1-part resume/CV, 1-part "only known for one event". TheValeyard (talk) 03:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as suggested. It will be better we have a list on these kind of records and mention there. Greenbörg (talk) 09:28, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Week Delete while he may be notable for only one event but i am curios if landing in Guinness Book of World Record makes one pass the basic WP:GNG. --Saqib (talk) 09:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.