Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadiaa Nyce (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I don't think anyone can argue that we keep this. G5 and G4 apply, Anyone who finds sources is welcome to let me know and I'll unsalt. Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nadiaa Nyce[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined the speedy on this article simply because it has been six years since the previous AfD, but frankly, she still doesn't seem to pass WP:PORNBIO because after a thorough Gsearch, I could find no evidence that she was ever even nominated for anything. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 04:55, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 05:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:54, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:54, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The previous AfD may have been six years ago but this porn star is still not notable. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz has tagged this for G4 speedy and I agree. Fails GNG with only passing RS mentions. No real claim for passing PORNBIO. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing to suggest this pornstar is anyway notable. Finnegas (talk) 20:14, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - And salt the name(s). --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Why should it be salted? I don't think it's been created several times. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 22:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Nadia Nyce was deleted 5 times before it was permanently salted. Nadiaa Nyce is an obvious attempt to go around protection. • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - Didn't realize that. Well, since it's been so long and a lot of people might not have seen the original article, I still don't quite agree with a speedy, but I would endorse spreading some salt around. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 03:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Deleted five times previously, then salted, and even the userfied versions were deleted at MFD. The subject hasn't been active in the porn industry or otherwise in the public eye since 1997, so the reasons for the prior deletions clearly stand. Deliberately created under a misspelled version of the subject's name to evade the still-in-effect salting. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 13:35, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- And, it turns out, created by a banned user, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx. I think we're done here. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 13:35, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.