Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadem Hossaen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:37, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nadem Hossaen[edit]

Nadem Hossaen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This RJ even lacks trivial coverage from independent reliable sources and therefore does not appear to meet basic GNG and. Steps were taken to locate sources WP:BEFORE this nomination, but were not successful. The article claims he has received a bunch of awards but I don't see any of them notable (al-least by WP standards). Saqib (talk) 12:52, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L293D ( • ) 13:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. L293D ( • ) 13:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. L293D ( • ) 13:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. L293D ( • ) 13:22, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 00:32, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete- Per reasons put forward by nominator and lack of reliable sources.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 04:52, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per Nom. Arman (Talk) 04:28, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.