Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadeem Omar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Quetta Gladiators. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nadeem Omar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails GNG. Saqib (talk) 03:02, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep looks notable. Perhaps a detailed nomination rationale was required. samee ^talk 15:40, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No notability outside of owning a notable team, and notability is not inherited. The sources name check him but does not discuss him in detail but his cricket franchise. Maybe merge would be more appropriate if not deletion. --Saqib (talk) 17:10, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Quetta Gladiators. Has no notability on it's own and all references mention him in association with the PSL team. Adamgerber80 (talk) 00:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:28, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I saw enough in two of the sources to believe he qualifies for having had reliable significant independent coverage and that it is likely that an interested wikipedia editor would be capable of finding more. It is a mediocre wikipedia article, but it is about a notable person. I comment that owning a sports team makes you neither notable, or non-notable. What it often does do is make you worthy of being profiled by sources that will give you enough coverage to be considered notable. George Steinbrenner has a very long article for example, and the only things he ever really did that would be considered notable was own the New York Yankees. But he owned them for nearly 40 years and acquired enough coverage to be easily notable as an individual. Macktheknifeau (talk) 14:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Quetta Gladiators: not independently notable; does not meet WP:ANYBIO and significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:45, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.