Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nada Herman-Witkamp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:18, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nada Herman-Witkamp[edit]

Nada Herman-Witkamp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:RS to satisfy GNG or NARTIST. Additionally, her exhibitions listed are in User:Theredproject/Predatory Exhibitions and Vanity Galleries. Theredproject (talk) 14:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 14:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 14:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Theredproject (talk) 14:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I see no independent recognition of her work. For example, ""Many of these galleries cite Nada Herman as one of their most in-demand artists.", sourced by two galleries, is just advertising and has been removed. GNG fail. Possibly (talk) 18:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I'm not finding any indication that this is a notable artist whose credentials match our criteria for WP:NARTIST nor WP:GNG. Written in a non-encyclopedic promtional tone which does not help. Netherzone (talk) 01:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete agree with what's already been said. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Curiocurio (talk) 21:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, looks like some copyright issues as well if we look at the artist's page. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, does not meet WP:NARTIST, have been unable to find any wikinotable galleries/museums that hold any of this artist's work, was part of an exhibition with father and grandfather at Manly Art Gallery and Museum (here) but this is not enough. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, As per above doesn't meet WP:NARTIST. Hulatam (talk) 09:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.