Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nachattar Gill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Ifnord 02:06, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nachattar Gill[edit]

Tagged as speedy but cursory google shows at least one album. Brought to AfD for wider examination. Abstain. brenneman ^{T}^{L} 12:44, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Tough call. I think I'm seeing three albums: http://www.musicindiaonline.com/l/23/m/artist.1115/ so clears the two album guideline. On the other hand does not assert notability. It's not enough to be notable, you need to assert it in a verifiable manner :-) Weregerbil 13:23, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable. Being notable should be enough. Kappa 17:21, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and cleanup adding albums. Capitalistroadster 01:22, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Kappa, but someone please add in details of the albums in order that it isn't renominated in short order. Stifle 15:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I believe the proper spelling of his first name is "Nachhattar",[1], so the stub should be moved if that's the case. Can anyone clarify? PJM 15:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, based on what I find. PJM 15:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, maybe I should have checked before tagging for speedy. Conscious 18:57, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.