Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabeglavi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 07:13, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nabeglavi[edit]

Nabeglavi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mineral water drink article, unreferenced, and I am not seeing any good reliable references. Half a year of outstanding notability and COI notice. I am afding it instead of prodding as 1) perhaps a Russian speaker can find sources and 2) I believe the creator may be topic banned from contributing, even if s/he wanted to participate. Can this be saved, or will we delete it as a commercial spam? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 – Northamerica1000(talk) 11:15, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:16, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:17, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:17, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Not sold in English speaking countries, so it fails as spam. Appears to have enough third party sources to meet WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 04:42, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.