Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabeel Zuberi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nabeel Zuberi[edit]

Nabeel Zuberi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ineligible for G7 as someone else has blanked the page, although it looks like an associated account. Either way, per GSS' redirecting rationale, Zuberi fails WP:GNG but clearly others contest this so I am AfDing to gain consensus. SITH (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - No evidence Zuberi played a significant role in shows listed in the article and fails WP:GNG. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nabeel Zubieri - it looks like a duplicate AfD on a duplicate article.PRehse (talk) 10:18, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! There were 2 articles created on wikipedia. The only problem was the spelling mistake. His name is Nabeel Zuberi, not Nabeel Zubieri. Therefore the articles could have looked the same. The other page is deleted, but this page has the correct spelling and correct biography. Please have a look at those references listed in it as I have added a lot of references and news links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Celebrity717real (talkcontribs) 18:29, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete and salt -- Per all above. Fails NACTOR and/or GNG. Too soon to be notable enough; anyways why G4 was not applied? WBGconverse 07:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.