Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NWA Pro Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NWA Pro Australia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable promotion that lacks third party sources. No indication as to why this promotion is notable. Ultra X987 (talk) 12:17, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article creator has known about the sourcing problem since he (re)created the article—the refimprove tag was present from the first edit. Coverage in reliable sources could demonstrate that the promotion is notable. Without the sourcing, the article doesn't present a case for it. —C.Fred (talk) 14:52, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Fails WP:NSPORTS. Sources provided do not provide significant coverage of this organization. A search for other sources doesn't come up with much, therefore fails WP:N. Auseplot (talk) 21:10, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.